On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 04:12:40PM +0200, Ross Cameron wrote:
| > I don't see the point in porting this to linux. Why settle for second-best
| > ?
| >
|
| Uhm perhaps to provide a better OSPF and BGP implementation to the for an OS
| that is the OS of choice of millions of users and thousands of corporations?
Why don't they pick "the better OS" to run that "better OSPF and BGP
implementation" ? They don't pick "the better OS", why would they pick
the "better, but then stripped down" routing daemons ?
(no need to answer that, it's a rhetorical question)
Paul 'WEiRD' de Weerd
--
>++++++++[<++++++++++>-]<+++++++.>+++[<------>-]<.>+++[<+
+++++++++++>-]<.>++[<------------>-]<+.--------------.[-]
http://www.weirdnet.nl/
