Ted Unangst wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Laurens Vets <[email protected]> wrote:
Dale Rahn wrote:
But this one isn't: 64MB ram, 800x480 resolution, unmentioned arm
processor
at unmentioned MHz, WindowsCE instead of linux?
The Always Innovating Touch Book maybe?
http://www.alwaysinnovating.com/home/index.htm
My current laptop also weighs three pounds, same as the touch book,
but has a 113% bigger screen with 110% more pixels, 12 times as much
RAM, 10 times as much storage, a keyboard that works, and probably
about 16 times the processing power.
OK, I get that I'm not in the market for a netbook, but that's exactly
the point. For people who want a real computer, suggesting they use
arm chips is a joke. This is not the first time the issue has come
up, nor is it the first time that someone has posted a link to a
company selling a product nobody has actually ever seen.
But it's not ARM, is it? :)
Tbh, I was just replying to Dale's comment: "I would love to see a
decent (cortex based?) arm laptop/netbook."
