On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:00:08 +1100
SJP Lists wrote:
> 2009/11/20 rhubbell <[email protected]>:
>
> > Definitely not missing the point. Maybe you missed mine. Not "worrying"
> > because you trust everything about OpenBSD and everyone that's worked
> > on it and every package you've installed and every piece of hardware
> > you've installed, etc., etc. It's naive to point elsewhere and say
> > "see, they're not secure". For example should I trust you and the
> > other "tooters" just because you insist OpenBSD's secure?
>
> It's not about absolute trust, or faith, it's about playing the odds.
>
> You can choose a OS built with security as the primary focus at one
> extreme, or one that's insecure by default at the other.
>
> No OS will be absolutely secure, but at least one tries to be.
>
I know.
