Scott McEachern <sc...@erratic.ca> writes: > Huh? Let me get this straight. You want to use a *new* package. You > have to use -current to get the new package. How do you figure > running -stable will help?
I wasn't clear enough: by "new package", I meant "a package not installed on my system yet" and not "the bleeding edge version of one package". > I'm with J.C. Roberts on this one. I got tired of seeing the cool > kids playing with the new toys on -current, got over the (wrong) > impression that -current is unstable, and started using -current with > the goodies. I haven't looked back since. Maybe I'll stick to -current too. But I'd like to give try staying -stable for a while and I could still play with the new toys every 6 month anyway. I wonder why does the FAQ recommend -stable over -current? -- Manuel Giraud