On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Jan Stary <h...@stare.cz> wrote: > On Mar 22 13:56:05, Dan Naumov wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Kenneth R Westerback >> <kwesterb...@rogers.com> wrote: >> > On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 01:33:07PM +0200, Dan Naumov wrote: >> >> Hello >> >> >> >> Are there any plans to bring ZFS support to OpenBSD so that users >> >> don't have to worry about things like fsck, running out of inodes and >> >> other silly stuff in the year 2010? >> >> >> >> Thanks. >> >> >> >> >> >> - Sincerely, >> >> Dan Naumov >> > >> > Nope. Check the archives for repeated discussions. The license is still >> > unsuitable last time I looked, if nothing else. >> > >> > .... Ken >> >> This is weird, it is claimed that CDDL is going against the BSD >> philosophy, yet both FreeBSD and NetBSD didn't have any problems >> including it in their base... > > This is exactly why you are a troll.
The question of why 2 different BSDs have no issues including specific code into their base, while another does is a valid one. When asked "hard questions", labeling the person asking them a troll is sadly a common occurrence on the internet. - Sincerely, Dan Naumov
