On 05/23 02:50, Owain Ainsworth wrote:
> On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 02:28:47PM -0700, Jeremy Evans wrote:
> > After I upgraded to OpenBSD 4.7, my dual head configuration stopped
> > working on my Radeon HD 2600 PRO.  This has been working for about a
> > year and a half with no problems since I got the video card.
> > 
> > I tried various xrandr incantations to get it to work, but no luck.  If
> > I get the left monitor to work, the right monitor turns off, and vice
> > versa.  By default, with the xorg.conf including below, the right
> > monitor displays output.  With the following commands, I can make the
> > left monitor display output, but then the right monitor turns off:
> > 
> >   xrandr --output DVI-1 --mode 1600x1200
> >   xrandr --output DVI-1 --auto
> > 
> > Both commands are needed, as with just the second, there is no change.
> > If I run a command such as:
> > 
> >   xrandr --output DVI-0 --mode 800x600
> > 
> > The left monitor stops displaying, and the right monitor starts
> > displaying.  In both cases, xrandr shows both monitors as displaying,
> > and I can move the mouse off one monitor to where the other monitor
> > would be.
> > 
> > From CVS, it looks like the reason is that OpenBSD 4.4-4.6 uses
> > xf86-video-ati 6.9.0, and OpenBSD 4.7 uses 6.12.2.
> > 
> > I know new video drivers are often tried in snapshots for a few weeks
> > before being committed to CVS.  Any chance that current snapshots
> > contain an updated version of xf86-video-ati?
> > 
> > Any other advice about things to try to get the dual head configuration
> > working?
> 
> Oh bloody wonderful.
> 
> I hate it when they do that.
> 
> I am currently chasing a bug in radeon 6.13.0 involving zaphod mode, but
> after that we'll try and get that as the default.
> 
> I can mail you offlist with a tarball of what we have so far, if you
> wish.

Owain,

I tried to respond off-list, but haven't heard back.  Anyway, I'd be
happy to test the work in progress, please do send me the tarball.  I
assume I should upgrade to the latest snapshot first?

Thanks,
Jeremy

Reply via email to