Jacob Meuser wrote: On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 05:13:19AM -0400, Tony Abernethy wrote:
> All I need to break any automated system you devise is to have some programs that I compile myself and use the system directories to hold the sources etc. > then you are on your own, not someone who is "just following the directions". you'd know that it doesn't apply to you. but whatever. -- jake...@sdf.lonestar.org SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org ------- It is essential that I understand the difference. (Although I have some difficulty in understanding how anybody could possibly actually be "just following the directions".) As soon as I depart from the directions, everything downstream is my responsibility. The developers are not and can not be responsible for guessing what I have or have not squirreled away wherever. On this silly thread, the upgrade did actually function as it should. Some unmentioned stuff AFTER the upgrade put things in the state BEFORE the upgrade. I can imagine scenarios where that is EXACTLY the results I would want, but that was not the case for this silly thread. For this silly thread, there is nothing that I see in the OpenBSD system that needs any fixing. (but some people who know better may/will disagree) Until and unless selecting "all" also gets the sources, I must assume that setting up the system for following -stable is a separate process.
