On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 02:31:18PM -0400, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
> I am testing vether(4) and I am wondering if this is a use case that
> should work.
> 
> ifconfig em0 172.16.0.10/24 up
> ifconfig bridge0 create
> ifconfig vether0 create
> ifconfig bridge0 add em0 add vether0 up
> ifconfig vether0 172.16.0.11/24 up
> 
> I can't ping the vether0 IP address from other hosts on the same
> network or from the same host. Should I be able to ping 172.16.0.11
> from somewhere else on the same network or from the same host? PF is
> disabled in this test.
> 

This will not work because em0 is having the clonable route for
172.16.0/24 and so arp is unable to work on vether0 since you created an
addressing conflict.

-- 
:wq Claudio

Reply via email to