On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 11:42:11PM +0000, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 04:39:30PM -0400, Tony Abernethy wrote:
> > Personally, I liked the article.
> > Small change in perspective changes an ordeal into an adventure.
> > 
> > Jacob Meuser wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 04:28:57PM +0300, Mihai Popescu B.S. wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > My post was not intended as a direct hit for the article. I told my
> > > > opinion to misc@ because undeadly ask for subscription, no more
> > > > anonymous coward post. Am I wrong ?
> > > >
> > > > I target airport behaviour with my comment. I use the airport for 6
> > > > flight until now, no problem at all with security teams. I was quick
> > > > and polite in answers and the time with them was short. Most of them
> > > > have the "nose" to see what they are dealing with.
> > > 
> > > bullshit.  sorry, but that is not true.
> > "Smart" security will inevitably outsmart itself.
> > Add respect to polite in the brew.
> > He inspects you. You inspect him. You respect each other. Works better.
> 
> sure.  I am always very polite wih "authority".  there was never any
> disrespect put out by me.  as I said, I *want* these people to do
> a good job.  they've got good people, it's the things/ways they
> are/aren't taught that is the problem.
> 
> > > 
> > > I regularly get picked on by "authority", but it's alwasy just been
> > > a pointless hassle.  I'll never forget the time a cop stopped me
> > > in my own neighborhood, in the rain, for walking against a signal,
> > > when his car was the only moving vehicle within a half mile.  the
> > > best part was when he dropped his papers in a puddle.
> > > 
> > > > If you start
> > > > playing, they will answer accordingly, not because you look like a
> > > > suspect, it is more like an answer.
> > > 
> > > the only playing was their own game.  after all, it is they who
> > > choose to start the games.
> > If they are wasting your time they will keep it up.
> > If you are wasting their time they will drop you in a hurry.
> > The best tactic is when you are obviously suppressing a laugh.
> 
> well, they held us there, for nothing but having more than one laptop
> and looking like a poor hippie.  I didn't care, I figured it was all
> going to happen anyway.  but maybe while they were busy with us, they
> were letting some slick and polite well dressed one laptop carrying
> creep go who they should have looked at closer?  who knows.

That would have been me.  Enjoy the contraband chili boys.

> 
> > > 
> > > > Have fun ! (but not in sensible areas).
> > > 
> > > but see, if authority can't take that you're laughing because their
> > > questions and assumptions *really are* ridiculous ...
> > > 
> > > the lady in the office where jcr was "held" when we met him was
> > > in charge of the place.  and it's clear why she was in charge.
> > > she was sharp and no-nonsense.  of course, you want such people
> > > in charge of such places.
> > > 
> > > even after we got out of that office I still had to deal with
> > > another person who inspected my bags.  with this uy though, I
> > > shared a good laugh, even though he was pretty thorough.
> > Watch how a person laughs. Even more a window into the soul than the eyes.
> > Customs tends to be sharper than security.
> > They probably do have a sense of humor, 
> > but it is never shared with "outsiders".
> > 
> > > 
> > > --
> > > jake...@sdf.lonestar.org
> > > SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org
> > 
> 
> -- 
> jake...@sdf.lonestar.org
> SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org

Reply via email to