On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 10:26:30AM +0200, Boudewijn Dijkstra wrote: > Op Sun, 17 Apr 2016 19:03:33 +0200 schreef Gilles Chehade > <[email protected]>: > >On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 02:00:41PM +0200, Boudewijn Dijkstra wrote: > >>After some hours or days after starting smtpd I get: > >> > >>Apr 13 21:39:58 belisama spf[25177]: warn: filter-api:spf socketpair: > >>Too > >>many open files > >>Apr 13 21:39:58 belisama delay[14001]: warn: session e6640a1435e43218: > >>write > >>out of sequence > >>Apr 13 21:39:58 belisama last message repeated 95 times > >> > >>After a first such warning, the same happens on every incoming message. > >>The > >>filter process then has several hundred sockets to its name. > >> > >>The same has also occurred with a filter chain of only filter-pause but > >>this > >>didn't cause any > >>real problems. However, with my filter-spf in the chain this results in > >>messages being accepted with an empty data portion, which is highly > >>undesirable. > >> > >>On an error, socketpair() sets errno, so as a work-around I think I > >>should > >>reject with 451 if errno is found to be nonzero inside a filter > >>callback. > >>Should this work? > > > >Hi, > > > >Care to open a ticket on our tracker with a copy/paste of this mail ? > > > >I need to investigate this more in-depth > > https://github.com/OpenSMTPD/OpenSMTPD/issues/674 > > Added some info gathered over the past weekend. >
thanks ! -- Gilles Chehade https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg -- You received this mail because you are subscribed to [email protected] To unsubscribe, send a mail to: [email protected]
