could be interesting to implement a tls builtin filter, so you could:

    filter check-tls phase mail-from match !tls junk

and flag non tls options as spam, without discarding them completely


September 5, 2019 8:38 AM, "Reio Remma" <r...@mrstuudio.ee> wrote:

> On 02/09/2019 18:37, Reio Remma wrote:
> 
>> On 02/09/2019 18:36, Reio Remma wrote:
>> 
>>> Now I ended up switcing to tls-require on port 25. I wonder how much >> 
>>> spam that will take down!
>>> :)
> 
> Well, that's depressing.
> 
> On the spam front - requiring TLS apparently cuts off about 99% of spam 
> (SpamAssassin is
> practically out of work), but we do get the occasional legit non-TLS 
> connection and I'm having to
> switch back to optional TLS. :/
> 
> So TLS is 20 years old but they're (banks etc) still sending somewhat private 
> info in plain text.
> 
> 'twas fun while it lasted. :)
> 
> I'm going to start schooling them one by one.
> 
> Reio

Reply via email to