could be interesting to implement a tls builtin filter, so you could:
filter check-tls phase mail-from match !tls junk
and flag non tls options as spam, without discarding them completely
September 5, 2019 8:38 AM, "Reio Remma" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 02/09/2019 18:37, Reio Remma wrote:
>
>> On 02/09/2019 18:36, Reio Remma wrote:
>>
>>> Now I ended up switcing to tls-require on port 25. I wonder how much >>
>>> spam that will take down!
>>> :)
>
> Well, that's depressing.
>
> On the spam front - requiring TLS apparently cuts off about 99% of spam
> (SpamAssassin is
> practically out of work), but we do get the occasional legit non-TLS
> connection and I'm having to
> switch back to optional TLS. :/
>
> So TLS is 20 years old but they're (banks etc) still sending somewhat private
> info in plain text.
>
> 'twas fun while it lasted. :)
>
> I'm going to start schooling them one by one.
>
> Reio
