On 05/09/2019 09:38, Reio Remma wrote:
On 02/09/2019 18:37, Reio Remma wrote:
On 02/09/2019 18:36, Reio Remma wrote:
Now I ended up switcing to tls-require on port 25. I wonder how much
spam that will take down! :)
On the spam front - requiring TLS apparently cuts off about 99% of
spam (SpamAssassin is practically out of work), but we do get the
occasional legit non-TLS connection and I'm having to switch back to
optional TLS. :/
Now I'm thinking I should look into getting SpamAssassin score mails by
lacking TLS.
Reio
