Le 04/06/2021 à 13:58, Pete a écrit :
It seems that the reality is "Finally, a number of decisions must
(mandatory) be taken:"
Well sure. A decison has to be made.
filter whitelist \
chain { test-rdns , test-fcrdns } \
bypass
Is this even valid syntax? AFAIR the decision needs to be specified with the
filter.
I think it should be something along those lines:
filter "white-rdns" phase connect match rdns <whitelist> bypass
filter "white-fcrdns" phase connect match fcrdns bypass
That’s not the same thing though. I did not reply earlier because I
could not find a solution, but actually I don’t think there is one.
Indeed, François wants bypass only if both rdns and fcrdns matches, not
if either of them does. Hence why he tries to test both at once, but I
don’t think there is a way to do this.
Anyway, as shown in the last emails in this thread the issue is broken
headers on the sender side, and rspamd tagging as spam. So whitelist
should occur at rspamd level eventually, while the best thing would
indeed be fixing broken headers.
Regards.
