Hello, and sorry for being late.
On 2025-10-28 05:20, Robert B. Carleton wrote:
I host is a non-profit with monthly meetings. There are around 50
members. Once a month, a announcement email is sent out. When it's
sent out, it takes about a day for the queue to clear, because the MTA
is immediately throttled for sending multiple emails per provider.
On 2025-10-29 16:32, Omar Polo wrote:
I run a mail server that can queue a few thousand in a day.
Warnings are usually triggered not so much by volume as by rare
irregular bursts.
I distribute conclusions of my research to approximately one thousand
recipients, to my colleagues. Irregularly, much less frequently than
once a month. Therefore, I divide the circular letter according to the
areas of interest, up to one hundred recipients, and do not send email
at once.
On 2025-10-28 09:56, Joe Cook wrote:
I'm running in a similar scenario, but with ~500 members and daily
messages. but didn't had much problems. …From what I read I doubt your mail history, I doubt it meets the
threshold of a bulk mailer for any of those systems.
On 2025-10-28 14:42, Robert B. Carleton wrote:
The compliance status for the subject domains are all green. Spam is
0%. There's no data for the feedback loop. The DKIM success rate is
100%. Encryption is 100%. Delivery errors are 0.
On what legal basis are being intercepted letters not addressed to them
in this way? Who gave whom such powers, and when? This is clearly a
crime. Sadly, we have become accustomed to and resigned ourselves to the
fact that our lives are constantly restricted by anonymous clerks who
themselves send “noreply” letters on a massive scale.
Vladas
