Washington Insider with Ronald Kessler











 

  








Sen. Bond: Cyberattack More Devastating Than Nuclear Bomb






Wednesday, July 15, 2009 9:09 AM

By: Ronald Kessler 
 




A cyberattack on the United States could be more devastating economically than 
a nuclear bomb and could cause massive deaths as well, Sen. Kit Bond, vice 
chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, tells Newsmax. 
 
“You can cause more economic harm with a cyberattack than a nuclear one,” Bond 
says. “It could crush our country and the world economy, which depends upon the 
United States as the world’s leading economy. If they take us down, they 
cripple everybody.” 
 
Bond says well-publicized cyberattacks this month underscore the seriousness of 
the problem, which his committee has been studying. The recent attacks spread 
viruses to U.S. and South Korean personal computers, slowing them down and 
turning them into zombies connected to unknown sites. 
 
The Missouri Republican says the recent attacks demonstrate how a cyberattack 
“could take down our entire infrastructure, which depends upon the use of 
computers and information technology.” 
 
Bond notes that while the 3,000 deaths caused by the 9/11 attacks were tragic, 
“the relatively minor disruption of our economy caused billions of dollars of 
losses. Regrettably, the fictional movie ‘Live Free or Die Hard’ lays out the 
nightmare scenario. And if Hollywood can figure it out, you know darn well that 
if the terrorists didn’t know it then, they know it now.” 
With such an attack, “you could potentially disrupt air traffic control and 
cause deaths, you could perhaps even open floodgates on hydro-dams that would 
put lives at risk,” Bond says. “If you took down a major Wall Street 
institution, you could cause a major disruption in the economy, amounting to 
trillions of dollars. We’ve seen how the financial mess has crashed our 
financial system. This would be far more devastating and happen more quickly.” 
 
A cyberattack could also disrupt the food supply, electrical power, heat, and 
air conditioning.
 
Whether the recent attacks originated in North Korea, as some believe, is not 
known. That’s one of the problems when dealing with a cyberattack: Its origin 
is often impossible to trace.
 
“There are very significant, large governments which probably have the capacity 
to do great damage,” Bond notes. “In addition, we have terrorists who are very 
knowledgeable on computers, and if they developed some of these skills, they 
could perform attacks. We wouldn’t know where they came from.” 
 
Bond adds, “If we can’t prevent the attack, picking up the pieces is going to 
be a very difficult thing. If you can’t track, if you don’t know who it is, 
it’s very difficult to retaliate against a sophisticated hacker who uses a 
series of cutouts to spread a virus.” 
 
Bond opposes President Barack Obama’s plan to appoint a cyber czar to oversee 
the U.S. response. 
 
“I’m not willing to live under a Russian-style czarist system,” Bond says. 
“He’s talking about a czar for everything. We’ve got a system that works. Now 
I’m not in favor necessarily of forming a new bureaucracy. But that 
responsibility ought to be in the hands of either a new agency or an existing 
agency, where the Senate has confirmation authority and the head of it reports 
to Congress to tell us what they’re doing.”
 
Whether located in the Defense Department or Homeland Security, the agency 
would be responsible for providing assistance to the private sector and could 
work with the intelligence community, the military, and the rest of the 
government to make sure that “we have the capacity to pre-empt strikes where we 
see a potential threat arising, before it destroys our system,” Bond says.
 

Ronald Kessler is chief Washington correspondent of Newsmax.com. View his 
previous reports and get his dispatches sent to you free via e-mail. Go here 
now. 
 



© 2009 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

.


      
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
This is a Free Speech forum. The owner of this list assumes no responsibility 
for the intellectual or emotional maturity of its members.  If you do not like 
what is being said here, filter it to trash, ignore it or leave.  If you leave, 
learn how to do this for yourself.  If you do not, you will be here forever.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to