Sure, if you want to, go ahead. On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Matt Birkholz<[email protected]> wrote: >> From: Chris Hanson <[email protected]> >> Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 15:13:00 -0700 >> >> Mea culpa. Despite the advice that it was a bad idea, I turned on the >> "ident" feature. Later, I turned it off again. No big surprise that >> this feature causes trouble. > > I thought we were almost there. We just needed a few more "$Id: > mumble $" tags replaced by "$Id$". Commit 8acc2b03 seems to have gone > the other way, replacing them all with hashes from... the commit > before (4d98a2ff)? > > Whither the $Id$ tags? > > I would have left them alone as a historical artifact of an obselete > revision system, but now they are all... random. I think they should > be quietly exterminated. > > If the tags looked like > > $Id: screen.scm 2008/01/30 20:02:05 cph $ > > they might be useful, but this > > $Id: bba23e8471f3700cade600dfa70919d7f9709c7e $ > > leaves me cold. > > Shall I take them all out? >
_______________________________________________ MIT-Scheme-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/mit-scheme-devel
