On Fri, 2017-11-03 at 01:32 +0000, Taylor R Campbell wrote: > We definitely shouldn't advertise Blowfish as `one of the faster > block ciphers'
I laughed at that too. Feel free to fix. > I polled mit-scheme-users for who uses these and for what. Anyone > here have thoughts on this? I'm volunteering to do the work to > provide drop-in MD5 and Blowfish code replacements in microcode/, and > get rid of the rest if nobody objects. I would be happy to wrap a modern library if someone were to suggest one. I'm just trying to kill microcode modules. Nicer plug-ins with documentation, replacing all of the old modules, is just part of that campaign. Wrapping more desirable libraries could also be a part. A native Scheme implementation would be cool too, though I reserve my powder for libraries that do IO. I can't stand a library that blocks my world. _______________________________________________ MIT-Scheme-devel mailing list MIT-Scheme-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/mit-scheme-devel
