I'm happy to remove support for blowfish, mhash, and mcrypt. They were reasonable choices at the time but that's at least 15-20 years ago now.
I'd like to retain support for MD5, however it's done. This is still useful for non-cryptographic purposes. On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 12:00 PM, Arthur A. Gleckler <sch...@speechcode.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 10:35 PM, Taylor R Campbell <campb...@mumble.net> > wrote: > > >> Merely _using_ MD5 or Blowfish in a protocol is risky! >> > > Yes, of course. > > >> That said, I am pretty well acquainted with what goes into crypto >> implementation. >> > > It sounds like you do. Thank you in advance for doing the work. I have > several [ersonal projects that would benefit from easy access to good, > simple crypto. > > _______________________________________________ > MIT-Scheme-devel mailing list > MIT-Scheme-devel@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/mit-scheme-devel > >
_______________________________________________ MIT-Scheme-devel mailing list MIT-Scheme-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/mit-scheme-devel
