Hi there,

reading the original papers, you could just use MITK without Qt, e.g. just as a 
library rather than a GUI framework.
However, now MITK has to have CTK, and am I right in thinking that CTK must 
have Qt?
If MITK only uses the CTK plugin architecture, then does this plugin 
architecture have to have Qt? I believe it does.

The reason I ask is that if I am just building a command line program that 
would:

1. Load images using MITK DataStorage, and I/O routines
2. Use the AccessByITK stuff to run a few ITK filters
3. Write the image to file using MITK I/O routines

then I don't really want to depend on Qt.  Is Qt now unavoidable?

Thanks

Matt



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
_______________________________________________
mitk-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mitk-users

Reply via email to