Hi, MITK can still be used without Qt.
CTK has a hard dependency to QtCore (at least), certain CTK libraries/plug-ins may have other Qt (or non-Qt) dependencies. However, MITK can still be build without CTK (then the plugin framework will not be available, of course). If you just set MITK_USE_QT and MITK_USE_BLUEBERRY to OFF, you should be good to go. Best, Sascha P.S.: We will answer your other questions soon ;-) On 11/09/2011 04:55 PM, Clarkson, Matt wrote: > Hi there, > > reading the original papers, you could just use MITK without Qt, e.g. just as > a library rather than a GUI framework. > However, now MITK has to have CTK, and am I right in thinking that CTK must > have Qt? > If MITK only uses the CTK plugin architecture, then does this plugin > architecture have to have Qt? I believe it does. > > The reason I ask is that if I am just building a command line program that > would: > > 1. Load images using MITK DataStorage, and I/O routines > 2. Use the AccessByITK stuff to run a few ITK filters > 3. Write the image to file using MITK I/O routines > > then I don't really want to depend on Qt. Is Qt now unavoidable? > > Thanks > > Matt > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > RSA(R) Conference 2012 > Save $700 by Nov 18 > Register now > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 > _______________________________________________ > mitk-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mitk-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 _______________________________________________ mitk-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mitk-users
