For a higher number of labels I would also think of a properly parametrized volume rendering solution first. Depends a bit on the size and shape of structures though but wouldn't be too difficult to try out.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Clarkson, Matt [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Donnerstag, 9. November 2017 16:42 > To: Dinkelacker, Stefan > Cc: MITK > Subject: Re: [mitk-users] Multi-Label Visualisations > > Thanks Stefan, > > it might take a bit of work, and planning. > > For example, if you have an image with automatically generated labels, say > up to 256 from some automatic segmentation, and then you want to visualise > each region as a different colour. > > If you do surface rendering, you’d need to generate 256 new surfaces. But > would these be hidden, and just linked to the original image, as parent-child > relationship? > Generating them might take some time, and what sort of colour maps would > be people want? > Then if you delete the image, do you delete all the surfaces? > > Or would volume rendering suffice? i.e. generate a LUT with 256 colours, and > have some ray-tracing function that doesnt interpolate and makes things > look fully opaque. > > Im not sure at this stage. > > M > > > > On 9 Nov 2017, at 14:42, Dinkelacker, Stefan <s.dinkelacker@dkfz- > heidelberg.de> wrote: > > > > Hi Matt, > > > > as far as I know there is currently no quick way to visualize > > multi-label segmentations in 3-d other than doing it by a custom > > ITK/VTK pipeline. As the multi-label segmentation still has prototype > > character in some aspects, we will discuss the segmentation in detail > > next week, to address these kinds of issues in near future. :-) > > > > Best, > > Stefan > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Clarkson, Matt [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Donnerstag, 9. November 2017 13:57 > > To: MITK > > Subject: [mitk-users] Multi-Label Visualisations > > > > Hi there, > > > > Is there a way in MITK of quickly/automatically doing 3D surface or volume > rendering of multi-label segmentations? > > If so, which version of MITK is it available in, as we are a bit behind the > curve at the moment. > > > > Thanks > > > > M > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -------- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's > > most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > > _______________________________________________ > > mitk-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mitk-users > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging > tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > mitk-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mitk-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ mitk-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mitk-users
