Hi Sascha,

I tried on a broken and a good setup (some of my builds work on my computer but never on my colleagues'). Sadly, I got exactly the same output on both. This doesn't any sense to me.

$ /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 --list bin/plugins/liborg_blueberry_core_expressions.so bin/plugins/liborg_blueberry_core_expressions.so: error while loading shared libraries: liborg_blueberry_core_runtime.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

$ ldd -r bin/plugins/liborg_blueberry_core_expressions.so
bin/plugins/liborg_blueberry_core_expressions.so: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQt5Core.so.5: version `Qt_5.12' not found (required by bin/plugins/liborg_blueberry_core_expressions.so)
    linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffdbfbf3000)
    libgtk3-nocsd.so.0 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk3-nocsd.so.0 (0x00007fe317301000)
    liborg_blueberry_core_runtime.so => not found
    libCTKPluginFramework.so.0.1 => not found
    libCTKCore.so.0.1 => not found
    libmbilog.so => not found
    libPocoXML.so.60 => not found
    libPocoFoundation.so.60 => not found
    libpthread.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007fe3170e2000)     libQt5Core.so.5 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQt5Core.so.5 (0x00007fe316997000)     libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6 (0x00007fe31660e000)     libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00007fe3163f6000)
    libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x00007fe316005000)
    libdl.so.2 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdl.so.2 (0x00007fe315e01000)
    /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007fe317768000)
    libz.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libz.so.1 (0x00007fe315be4000)
    libicui18n.so.60 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libicui18n.so.60 (0x00007fe315743000)     libicuuc.so.60 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libicuuc.so.60 (0x00007fe31538c000)     libdouble-conversion.so.1 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdouble-conversion.so.1 (0x00007fe31517b000)     libglib-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0 (0x00007fe314e64000)
    libm.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6 (0x00007fe314ac6000)
    libicudata.so.60 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libicudata.so.60 (0x00007fe312f1d000)
    libpcre.so.3 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcre.so.3 (0x00007fe312cab000)
undefined symbol: _ZTIN5berry6ObjectE (bin/plugins/liborg_blueberry_core_expressions.so)
*... Around 110 lines of **undefined symbol ...
2 lines are somewhat different*
symbol qt_version_tag version Qt_5.12 not defined in file libQt5Core.so.5 with link time reference (bin/plugins/liborg_blueberry_core_expressions.so) symbol _ZdlPvm version Qt_5 not defined in file libQt5Core.so.5 with link time reference (bin/plugins/liborg_blueberry_core_expressions.so)

Running the same commands while the application is running or after the application closes give the same results, except for the .so address (0x00...). With all those problems, I wonder how the application manages to start! How can an application starts with missing libraries and undefined symbols...

Nil

Le 2019-07-19 à 16:06, Sascha Zelzer a écrit :

Hi,

I am not sure what you tried already, but more information would certainly help here. If you can reproduce a state where you know that starting your application will show the described errors, have a look at the output of those two commands before you actually start your app:

/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 --list /home/fmorency/softwares/MITK-v2018.04.2-54-gca0a3e57c1-linux-x86_64/bin/plugins/liborg_blueberry_core_expressions.so

ldd -r /home/fmorency/softwares/MITK-v2018.04.2-54-gca0a3e57c1-linux-x86_64/bin/plugins/liborg_blueberry_core_expressions.so


Then start your app and afterwards run the commands again. Is the output any different?

Best,

Sascha

On 7/19/19 8:09 PM, Nil Goyette wrote:

Hi all,

We can't release our application because of this problem so I tested more. Here's some facts about the problem:

  * Mitk Workbench doesn't have the problem. It happens only on Linux
    on each new releases (commit + make package), even if they are
    all based on MITK 2018.04.2. I do not use the "build tree", I use
    "make package".
  * --Blueberry.clean and deleting ~/.local/share/Imeka produce
    almost the same error.
  * The paths are right. imagenavigator.so is where the app thinks it is.
  * It's clearly related to plugins.db located in
    ~/.local/share/Imeka. The first (and only) crash is creating this
    file. The next run is doubling its size, to a working condition.
    A working build simply creates the file and continue running the
    application.
  * There's no problem on the computer where the package was created.
    Even when I delete plugins.db. And even when I delete all
    dependencies: Qt, MITK build and our app build. It seems to be
    incompatible between 16.04 and 18.04 builds but I'm not sure
    about that yet. Overall, this makes the bug really hard to test.

Knowing that the Mitk Workbench is fine and that you added "a few Qt dependencies" to fix it, can I have more details about what you did? How did you know which dependencies to add? I can't really add the imagenavigator plugin "more" than it's already added? How am I supposed to add them? Moreover, is there a way to have a stacktrace? It's only complaining about imagenavigator.so but I know that it exists at the right place! I must be doing something in my app that MITK Workbench isn't doing and I need to know who the culprint is.

Nil Goyette

Le 2019-06-21 à 04:47, Dinkelacker, Stefan a écrit :

Hi,

we had several of these issues and shortly before the last release. One had to open the Workbench three times before it continuously worked afterwards. Most of the issues were Qt related and we could fix it by adding a few Qt dependencies to our scripts that are actually meant to be dynamically loaded during runtime. We also noticed that these issues only occurred when starting MITK out of the build tree but the installers just worked fine as all binaries are at a single place.

AFAIK we still didn’t find the actual cause for the Poco-issue but it never happened in installers. Do you build installers for your clients or are they using build-tree versions of MITK?

I also see that you use the releases/2018-04 branch instead of the latest stable tag v2018.04.2. Just a small warning that it may fail from time to time, even though it should be much more stable than the master branch, though.

Stefan

*From:*Nil Goyette [mailto:nil.goye...@imeka.ca]
*Sent:* Thursday, June 20, 2019 3:41 PM
*To:* mitk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
*Subject:* [mitk-users] Startup error: ctkPluginException on first run

Hi all,

I upgraded to MITK 2018.04, built linux installers and my users see this error on the first time they open the application.

0.393! WARNING: Startup error: ctkPluginException: The plugin "/home/fmorency/softwares/MITK-v2018.04.2-54-gca0a3e57c1-linux-x86_64/bin/plugins/liborg_mitk_gui_qt_imagenavigator.so" could not be loaded: Cannot load library /home/fmorency/softwares/MITK-v2018.04.2-54-gca0a3e57c1-linux-x86_64/bin/plugins/liborg_mitk_gui_qt_imagenavigator.so: (/home/fmorency/softwares/MITK-v2018.04.2-54-gca0a3e57c1-linux-x86_64/bin/plugins/liborg_blueberry_core_expressions.so: undefined symbol: _ZN5berry14ElementHandler6CreateEPNS_19ExpressionConverterEPN4Poco3XML7ElementE)

It opens without any problem when they try again. It's happen *only the first time*. It seems you can't mix MITK 2016.11 and MITK 2018.04. We tried deleting the temp folder ~/.local/share/Imeka, or using --Blueberry.clean, but it gives almost the same error as before.

0.437! WARNING: Failed to install plugin  QUrl("file:///home/fmorency/softwares/MITK-v2018.04.2-54-gca0a3e57c1-linux-x86_64/bin/plugins/liborg_mitk_gui_qt_imagenavigator.so" <file:///\\home\fmorency\softwares\MITK-v2018.04.2-54-gca0a3e57c1-linux-x86_64\bin\plugins\liborg_mitk_gui_qt_imagenavigator.so>) : ctkPluginException: Failed to install plugin
Caused by: ctkPluginException: The plugin ... *REST IS IDENTICAL*

I guess that renaming the project, from "Imeka" to anything else, would solve this problem, but we don't really want to change our company name! Is there a way to avoid this? Asking our users to open the application twice seems unprofessional.

Nil Goyette



_______________________________________________
mitk-users mailing list
mitk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mitk-users


_______________________________________________
mitk-users mailing list
mitk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mitk-users
_______________________________________________
mitk-users mailing list
mitk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mitk-users

Reply via email to