On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 1:03 AM, Nick Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 11:38 PM, Russell Ryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hey all,
>>
>>  I just merged my branch into trunk. For those that don't know I've been
>> working on a replacement for the visual waveform code as part of GSOC.
>> We're going to package this code with the upcoming 'beta 4' release to
>> try and discover any problems it might have. Releasing a beta4 is good
>> because we've fixed a lot of critical bugs, and it would be good to
>> confirm with people who reported the bugs that the issues have been
>> resolved before the 1.6.0 release.
>
> First impression: awesome! Is it just my imagination or are these
> waveforms actually higher resolution?
> They are certainly faster. And whatever you did made the slowness of
> the VU-meters go away too, which was really bugging me.
> My dream is to be able to DJ from OpenBSD, and this is the second last
> step in that (the only thing left is to fix the BPM Detector thread
> eating the processor and making the currently playing stream skip).
> Thank you so so much.
>
> Question: when you say GL accelerated do you mean DRI? Because OpenBSD
> does not have DRI in the kernel yet, so I'm definitely not using it,
> but it still runs acceptably fast for me.
>


Sanity check: it *is* intentionally that it doesn't resize the
waveform as you change the rate sliders, right?

-Nick

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
_______________________________________________
Mixxx-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mixxx-devel

Reply via email to