Ben Wheeler wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 08:12:53PM -0500, Nick Guenther wrote:
>> Official Suggestion Time: instead of continuing to fight with XML, why
>> don't we just switch to: http://www.hyperrealm.com/libconfig/
> 
> Sorry but I think that config file format is utterly hideous! It's like
> some bastard offspring of an unholy union between plaintext config files 
> and C syntax, taking the worst aspects of both. You have to be a programmer 
> to understand the syntax and edit it without breaking it, which somewhat
> defeats the point of having a plain config file rather than just
> serializing data structures as `eval'able code (something that's quite
> in vogue in the Perl world, and I regard as Pure Evil.)

Actually, I think YAML is more popular in the Perl world these days.  At
least, I know I use it almost exclusively.  It might not be a bad idea
here either.

http://www.yaml.org/start.html
http://yaml.org/spec/1.2/#id2562276

For a simple list of config items, its about as easy to read/edit as an
.ini file would be.  More complex data structures are also possible, and
they look a heck of a lot nicer than XML does (in my opinion).

Mark

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
Mixxx-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mixxx-devel

Reply via email to