Hrm... Just reading up on wikipedia about YAML, I quite like what I see so far.
In a way it reminds me more of wiki mark-up then anything else and I could see the relational ability to do value referencing and inhertience could prove quite useful in some situations. On 28/01/2009, Ben Wheeler <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 08:18:48AM -0800, Mark Glines wrote: >> > serializing data structures as `eval'able code (something that's quite >> > in vogue in the Perl world, and I regard as Pure Evil.) >> >> Actually, I think YAML is more popular in the Perl world these days. > > YAML is what I tell people they should be using instead of Data::Dumper > and eval. > >> For a simple list of config items, its about as easy to read/edit as an >> .ini file would be. More complex data structures are also possible, and >> they look a heck of a lot nicer than XML does (in my opinion). > > Agreed. It's about as intuitive and self-documenting as any > comprehensive format I've seen. > > Ben > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by: > SourcForge Community > SourceForge wants to tell your story. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword > _______________________________________________ > Mixxx-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mixxx-devel > -- __ --- == __/ t.O ==-- http://stacktrace.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ Mixxx-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mixxx-devel
