Albert Santoni wrote: > factor of 1 for the foreseeable future: If you disappear, we won't > have anyone else to do win64 builds. We can only hope and pray that > wider adoption of 64-bit Windows is inevitable, and that sooner or > later we'll have more 64-bit Windows developers.
True, but this problem is kind of self-balancing. Since I have been taking copious notes on the Wiki, all people would need is access to a Win64 system and some willingness to follow them. Therefore, anyone that could run the 64-bit package is also capable of building it. So if I disappear and someone complains that they need an updated Win64 package, they will have just volunteered to provide it. :) > (Is Windows 7 going > to come in both 32- and 64-bit flavours? I think so. > I wish they'd just make the > switch to exclusively 64...) :) Are you kidding?! Do you realize that many relatively recent systems can't run all-native 64-bit code? If they did this, it would cut out a huge upgrade market, something a for-profit company is unlikely to do. :) By the same token, it seems like XP x64 is/was kind of a secret. Sean <<--------------------------------------------------------------------------------->> This E-Mail message has been scanned for viruses and cleared by >>SmartMail<< from Smarter Technology, Inc. <<--------------------------------------------------------------------------------->> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Register Now & Save for Velocity, the Web Performance & Operations Conference from O'Reilly Media. Velocity features a full day of expert-led, hands-on workshops and two days of sessions from industry leaders in dedicated Performance & Operations tracks. Use code vel09scf and Save an extra 15% before 5/3. http://p.sf.net/sfu/velocityconf _______________________________________________ Mixxx-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mixxx-devel
