Hi Peter,
my idea was to expose the needed function from Qt and from Mixxx to a lets
say a system script domain.
This is of cause a lot of work. A C++ only solution is a good start and
will work just fine.
If we manage it with a shared object loader, it is also a working solution.
Kind regards,
Daniel
2014-05-21 18:21 GMT+02:00 Peter G. Marczis <marc...@demonkutya.com>:
> Hi,
> Well, I did not thought that far in the story, just found that they have
> API... In fact as a first version "just" upload and preference pages
> changes would be okay I think, but your idea from plugin system would be
> great ! In fact, I'm not so familiar with the mixxx internal life, so I
> would first do a static lib, which can handle mixcloud api from C++, of
> course this would be even better if we have shared lib which can be loaded
> somehow into mixxx... or as most of these APIs are http post / get, we may
> do a generic system in which you can "feed" the strings to handle it
> properly... hard question... or just reuse the midi mapper plugin and use
> javascript for these too... ?
>
> Br,
> Peter.
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Daniel Schürmann <dasch...@mixxx.org>wrote:
>
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> > I was just thinking that more cloud service we have is the better ...
>>
>> This is a valid point. So there is nothing against working with the
>> Mixcloud API if you have fun. And if you get sponsored, it is even more fun
>> :-).
>>
>> IMHO the jumping point here is if and how we will merge this to the
>> master branch.
>> A generic plug-In solution, something like the controller scrips might be
>> suit here.
>>
>> By the way: Do you have a idea how a Mixcloud integration will look like?
>> Is it all just about a preference page and a upload button in the recording
>> view?
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2014-05-21 10:43 GMT+02:00 Peter G. Marczis <marc...@demonkutya.com>:
>>
>> Hi,
>>> hm, for sure I did not think about this point of view... I was just
>>> thinking that more cloud service we have is the better for the project, I
>>> mean that we may attract some users with these integration...
>>> Anyway, after reading your answer I really looking to it from a
>>> different view :)
>>> I think you're right, we "could" ask something for it, like asking them
>>> to advertise use or something.
>>> Should I get some contact point and ask if they willing to have some
>>> kind of agreement ? As I'm just a wannabe mixxx developer, most probably
>>> I'm not the best
>>> person for this, I mean I would not dare to speak in the name of the
>>> developers as I had ~0.000000001% work in the whole project :)
>>>
>>> Br,
>>> Peter.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Daniel Schürmann
>>> <dasch...@mixxx.org>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Peter,
>>>>
>>>> we have also thought about including of different Cloud services.
>>>>
>>>> We had offered a GSoC project for this
>>>> http://www.mixxx.org/wiki/doku.php/gsoc2013ideas?s[]=cloud#cloud_library_support_soundcloud_spotify_etc
>>>> But finally we have decided not to offer this as GSoC project, because
>>>> of various reasons.
>>>>
>>>> The topic is so difficult, because we hit strong commercial interests,
>>>> once we starting to promote commercial cloud services.
>>>> IMHO a Cloud service integration in Mixxx is a implicit advertising. I
>>>> am not against doing this, but we should not do this for free.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe other on the list will correct me, but here the state of
>>>> discussion for possible solutions:
>>>> * We can do a Cloud service branch (OEM Version)
>>>> * We can offer a Cloud service API, to allow to install Cloud Service
>>>> Plug-Ins
>>>>
>>>> What is the biggest advantage for the user to have a Mixcloud
>>>> integration, isn't already possible to upload a recorded mix?
>>>>
>>>> Mixcloud was recently integrated in traktor, I wander how the deal was
>>>> made ...
>>>>
>>>> You may ask Mixcloud how they are willing to support you and the Mixxx
>>>> community for such a job.
>>>>
>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>
>>>> Daniel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2014-05-21 9:29 GMT+02:00 Peter G. Marczis <marc...@demonkutya.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> I'm just wondering if you guys ever considered to integrate mixcloud
>>>>> support ? Under support I mean upload... they provide API for uploading. I
>>>>> can check it and so make a C++ library for it if you think it worth the
>>>>> time... (right after I'm done with the LP mini mapping - documentation)
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.mixcloud.com/developers/
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks in advance !
>>>>> Br,
>>>>> Peter.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
>>>>> Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.
>>>>> Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform
>>>>> available
>>>>> Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
>>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Get Mixxx, the #1 Free MP3 DJ Mixing software Today
>>>>> http://mixxx.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Mixxx-devel mailing list
>>>>> Mixxx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mixxx-devel
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.
Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available
Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
_______________________________________________
Get Mixxx, the #1 Free MP3 DJ Mixing software Today
http://mixxx.org
Mixxx-devel mailing list
Mixxx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mixxx-devel
