Am Mittwoch, 17. September 2003 15:02 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> Any recommendations ?  I have a Athlon 2400+ and the New Motherboard
> has to have a good Linux support.

I had very strange problems with a nforce2-board (A7N8X) and an Athlon XP 
2400+ too. See "Reliable and stable mobo-chipset for video-encoding" in this 
list starting on Aug, 2nd 2003.

Since a short time I have a KT400_A_-Board (Epox EP-8K9A9+) with a VT8235CE 
Southbridge and it works, but there are some minor problems.

Please note the Epox EP-8K9A7i (KT400A) has the same southbridge as the 8KRA2+ 
with a KT600 chipset and IMO the southbridge is important, if there are more 
a less problems with the kernel.

I use SuSE 8.2 and the KT400A doesn't work fully with this distribution, esp. 
DMA and ACPI doesn't work and a default-kernel (not an Athlon-kernel!) is 
installed. So I had to compile a vanilla kernel 2.4.22. I used an ac-patch 
too, but I don't know if this patch is necessary for the KT400A.

I had no time to try newer kernels and so I decided to boot with acpi = off. I 
read too, that the acpi problem should be solved with newer kernels than 
2.4.22 and a patch. The newest test-kernel from 
ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mantel/next/RPM/k_athlon-2.4.21-82.i586.rpm 
should also be ok for the KT400A. I tested a little bit earlier version and 
acpi worked a lot better, but there were little acpi problems. Onboard-LAN 
and onboard-sound didn't work out of the box, but there is a big chance to 
get it work. Please note too, if you compile a vanilla-kernel you have to 
compile Alsa and there was a bug, if you use the ac-patch, but "./configure 
--with-cards" worked with my trident-card. I hope with 2.4.23-stable the 
problems would be solved.

Al


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Mjpeg-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users

Reply via email to