Hi Steven, <aside> Lying around useless with the 'flu today but I have spent the time learning more about PIC code and shared libs Basically, I think if all the relevant libs are compiled for shared library usage we should be in business. I've modified the nasm sources so all the assmbler routines are PIC. The trick will be to hack a a little shell wrapper for 'nasm' so that it looks more like gcc to the libtool ;-)
I also had a glance at the SIMD / vector intrinsics supported by gcc-3.x. Definately a cut above the old hand-hacked inline assembler stuff (as a quick look at James' AltiVec code will confirm). Once I; </aside> > > Hmmm, without the -I 0 I only get about 15 Frame/sec on my Athlon > 2800. Does -I 0 make that big of a difference? -I 0 really does make that big a difference. If you know you don't have interlaced material then you should always use it. One of the many many things for the list is a quick and dirty interlace-detector that activates this if the frame looks to have significant decorrelation between adjacent lines. Andrew PS Ronald: I don't think a gstreamer wrapper for libmpeg2encpp will be too hard. However, I worry about the fact that I need to link all the C++ library routines. Are there any existing C++ based plugin's? ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Mjpeg-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users