Ondrej Novy <[email protected]> writes: > hi, > > 2009/7/29 Greg Troxel <[email protected]> > >> Here's an example of what I'm talking about: >> >> >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=42.3921&lon=-71.15861&zoom=16&layers=B000FTF > > yes, exactly this is what i want to have on my Garmin - without kidding. > Better TOPO maps (for example TOPO 3 Pro Czech) have all buildings. You can > guess where you can go by foot - usefull for Geocaching :]. > > ... >> >> [I am still trying to get maps of mass made, and my first step after >> that is to tweak unnamed buildings down in importance or out.] > > > i think good point should be to create two 'official' styles, CityNavigator > and TOPO. There are plenty of useless thing in default style for road > navigation and few missing things for TOPO. > > What do you think?
That would be great. We have 'default' style now, which makes sense to make be the right thing for car-centric navigation, and another style for topo/detailed makes sense. I'll see what I can do once I get past whatever problem I'm having.
pgplFRJqDfiHZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
