Mark Burton wrote: > Hi Mark, > > Thanks for the contribution - it sounds like a good idea. > > One thought, how about using words and not numbers, words are easier to > interpret when you come back to them 3 months (5 minutes?) later. So > you could have something like: > > ignore-maxspeeds (same meaning as now for compatibility but we could > retire it in the future) > > but then have a new option that gives the flexibility you want: > > maxspeed=ignore (use speed defined in roadclass) > maxspeed=heed (use maxspeed if defined, roadclass otherwise) > maxspeed=lowest (use lowest of those speeds) > maxspeed=highest (use highest of those speeds - why not?) > > Cheers, > > Mark > I'll change it. The original intention was to avoid creating another option (as I'd seen some comment about "yet another option"). But I'm happy to go down that route.
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
