maning sambale schrieb am 17.11.2010 14:36: > AFAIK, the correct way of tagging is: > way 1 - amenity=townhall > way 2 - no tag > > relation > type=multipolygon > > way 1 = outer > way 2 = inner > > I'll check other data to verify.
This one of the possible solutions. Also ok would be way 1 - no tag way 2 - no tag relation type=multipolygon amenity=townhall way 1 = outer way 2 = inner In the beginning of multipolygon usage also the following scheme was used, but is considered faulty now. way 1 - amenity=townhall way 2 - amenity=townhall relation type=multipolygon way 1 = outer way 2 = inner Such an outdated tagging would result in two icons and should be considered as a tagging fault. If one of the first two solutions results in two icons, than the add-pois-to-areas function of mkgmap does not work correctly in combination with multipolygons. (In my point of view the add-pois-to-areas function should be reworked anyway, to give more control via the style file about which areas should generated which POIs.) Gruss Torsten _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
