Thanks Gerd
I’ve not seen that I’m afraid even in the lbl
From: GerdP [via GIS]
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 9:53 AM
To: n Willink
Subject: Re: version numbers
Maybe you find "Map created with mkgmap-svn" or "Map created with
mkgmap-unknown". I think that happened when building from source on a windows
machine, don't know it that is fixed now.
Gerd
n Willink wrote
Thanks for your advise.
I’m looking at the raw data using my own software to parse the TRE ,RGN,LBL
NOD MDR etc of an img
As far as I can tell there is no reference to mkgmaps’s version number , ie
2179,2370 in the img file itself.
By difference I meant looking at the contents/order of maplevels & subfiles
in TRE or the POIS found in MDR4 using the same osm but different versions of
mkgmap
Currently, I’m encountering some very strange & alarming behaviour when the
gpx of a route disappears when zooming in .This only happens when I don’t need
splitter.
I’ve never encounted the priority of an img override that of an IMG
From: GerdP [via GIS]
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 9:18 AM
To: n Willink
Subject: Re: version numbers
>
> There is another issue which perhaps betrays mkgmaps modesty but at present
> there is no way of telling which version has been used to create a gmapsupp
> or img - it could be included in the copyright section?
Hmm, you should find the string Map created with mkgmap-rxxxx in the *.img
file.
Don't you?
>
> I'm currently trying to compare imgs created by different versions of
mkgmap
> and analyse what causes their behaviour to be so different.
What tool do you use to compare two img files? If you just compare the files,
you
will see a lot of differences even if you use the same mkgmap and the same
input.
My identical_output_v2.patch might help, but one has to adapt it to current
mkgmap releases.
See also
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Small-holes-in-boundary-coverage-tp5569161p5624523.html
Ciao,
Gerd
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734827.html
> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
below:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734831.html
To start a new topic under Mkgmap Development, email [hidden email]
To unsubscribe from Mkgmap Development, click here.
NAML
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.2742 / Virus Database: 2617/5880 - Release Date: 11/07/12
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734845.html
To start a new topic under Mkgmap Development, email
[email protected]
To unsubscribe from Mkgmap Development, click here.
NAML
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.2742 / Virus Database: 2617/5880 - Release Date: 11/07/12
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734847.html
Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
