If you use gmaptool, and click on details, then you would see it...
e.g. a sample output (makes me remember to change the sourcecode
attribution from ccbysa to odbl..., something that should be done in
trunk too...):
File: D:/Garmin/openmtbmap/us-northeast/65310014.img, length 3437056
Header: 06.11.2012 17:44:37, DSKIMG, XOR 00, V 0.00, Ms 0
Mapset: US-Troy
fat: 400h - 600h - 4600h, block 512
maps: 1, sub-files 5
Sub-file fat length
65310014 RGN 600h 1692620
65310014 TRE 2200h 7820
map 3e48d3e (65310014)
date 06.11.2012 17:44:39
priority 31, parameters 1 4 23 0
levels [13,14,16,18,19,20,21,22,24], zoom [88,7,6,5,4,3,2,1,0]
N: 43.593750, S: 42.714844, W: -73.696289, E: -72.817383
OpenStreetMap and contributors
www.openstreetmap.org
Map data licenced under odbl
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/
Map created with mkgmap-runknown
Program released under the GPL
65310014 LBL 2400h 210838
CP 1252, Western European Sort
65310014 NET 2800h 389486
65310014 NOD 3000h 1117500
Map length s-f CP prio PID FID name
65310014 MPC 3418264 5 1252 31
End.
On 08.11.2012 11:04, n Willink wrote:
Thanks Gerd
I've not seen that I'm afraid even in the lbl
*From:* [hidden email] </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5734847&i=0>
*Sent:* Thursday, November 08, 2012 9:53 AM
*To:* [hidden email] </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5734847&i=1>
*Subject:* Re: version numbers
Maybe you find "Map created with mkgmap-svn" or "Map created with
mkgmap-unknown". I think that happened when building from source on a
windows machine, don't know it that is fixed now.
Gerd
n Willink wrote
Thanks for your advise.
I'm looking at the raw data using my own software to parse the TRE
,RGN,LBL NOD MDR etc of an img
As far as I can tell there is no reference to mkgmaps's version
number , ie 2179,2370 in the img file itself.
By difference I meant looking at the contents/order of maplevels
& subfiles in TRE or the POIS found in MDR4 using the same osm but
different versions of mkgmap
Currently, I'm encountering some very strange & alarming behaviour
when the gpx of a route disappears when zooming in .This only
happens when I don't need splitter.
I've never encounted the priority of an img override that of an IMG
From: GerdP [via GIS]
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 9:18 AM
To: n Willink
Subject: Re: version numbers
>
> There is another issue which perhaps betrays mkgmaps modesty but
at present
> there is no way of telling which version has been used to create
a gmapsupp
> or img - it could be included in the copyright section?
Hmm, you should find the string Map created with mkgmap-rxxxx in
the *.img file.
Don't you?
>
> I'm currently trying to compare imgs created by different
versions of mkgmap
> and analyse what causes their behaviour to be so different.
What tool do you use to compare two img files? If you just compare
the files, you
will see a lot of differences even if you use the same mkgmap and
the same input.
My identical_output_v2.patch might help, but one has to adapt it
to current mkgmap releases.
See also
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Small-holes-in-boundary-coverage-tp5569161p5624523.html
Ciao,
Gerd
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734827.html
> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
discussion below:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734831.html
To start a new topic under Mkgmap Development, email <A
href="wlmailhtml:/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5734845&i=0"
rel=nofollow target=_top link="external">[hidden email]
To unsubscribe from Mkgmap Development, click here.
NAML
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.2742 / Virus Database: 2617/5880 - Release Date:
11/07/12
------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
discussion below:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734845.html
To start a new topic under Mkgmap Development, email [hidden email]
</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5734847&i=2>
To unsubscribe from Mkgmap Development, click here.
NAML
<http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
Version: 2013.0.2742 / Virus Database: 2617/5880 - Release Date: 11/07/12
------------------------------------------------------------------------
View this message in context: Re: version numbers
<http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734847.html>
Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive
<http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Mkgmap-Development-f5324443.html> at
Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
--
keep on biking and discovering new trails
Felix
openmtbmap.org & www.velomap.org
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
