GerdP wrote > Hi Lambertus, > > thanks for the input. Yes, the log shows that the keep-complete functions > require more then 5GB. > This is okay, splitter has to save more information for this compared to > r202. > > ciao, > Gerd
Oh oh! I looked again at this logs and wondered why some numbers did not change during the different passes. I found out that the 7 passes in the ProblemListProcessor are more or less nonsense. The intention was to save memory by processing only a set of writers in each pass, but in fact all 7 passes store the node informations for all writers. In short: splitter requires either much less memory whhen this bug is corrected, or you can run everything in one pass if you specify --max-areas=2048 I hope I can fix this soon. Gerd -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/splitter-r247-tp5737673p5738287.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
