GerdP wrote > > Lambertus wrote >> Great to see that a simple log can be so helpful. :) >> Would be nice for splitter to be much faster with only a single pass on >> a moderate pc (i.e. 8 gb ram), but I'm not complaining as it is... >> >> Running splitter r247 with the added logging parameters on my dev pc >> now, will send the results tomorrow. > Right now I don't even know if the result is correct. I think I will not > need the log from r247 as I already know that it's wrong. > > Gerd
The results were ok, only runtime and memory usage was too high in your case. r250 corrects this. If you want to provide new logs, please run this version with java -agentlib:hprof=cpu=samples,depth=20 -XX:-HeapDumpOnOutOfMemoryError -XX:+PrintGCTimeStamps +PrintGCDetails -Xmx6000m -jar splitter.jar .... --max-areas=2048 This should result in max. 2 hours runtime. If you want to compare with the previous results, try also with --max-areas=255 Please send me the splitter log and the java.hprof . Gerd -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/splitter-r247-tp5737673p5738315.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
