Hi Thorsten, I think we can skip the logs, the different file sizes are intended. (as long as you see smaller files with r277)
See also http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/splitter-relations-to-be-checked-with-keep-complete-true-tp5740576p5741093.html regarding the changes suggested by WanMil. I don't know why this results in more mkgmap errors. Please send me a link to the two different 71200148.osm.pbf files and let me know the parms for mkgmap and the version of mkgmap you are using. Gerd > Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 14:25:32 +0100 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Regression in splitter r277 compared to r270? > Area too small ... > > > Hi, > > On Mon, Jan 14, GerdP wrote: > > > Thorsten Kukuk wrote > > > Where there any changes which let expect such a result? > > > > Well, most changes were optimizations, but some also change the output, > > r277 compared to r270: > > - keep-complete is the default > > - Changes suggested by WanMil to reduce the number of problem candidates > > - different handling of polygon files > > > > Do you see different areas.list files or just different output files? > > Please send me the logs of both versions for detailed analyses. > > No difference in areas.list or densities-out.txt, but the output files > are much smaller. > > I will send the output later. > > Thorsten > > -- > Thorsten Kukuk, Project Manager/Release Manager SLES > SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409 Nuernberg > GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
