Wanmil wrote: > the carpool flag in the branch can only be controlled by the tag > mkgmap:carpool. > > I don't know if we have to accept the Basecamp handling. > I still don't know if the bit which is toggled by mkgmap:carpool is > really used for carpool handling. I have done some tests with > Mapsource > but I couldn't find *any* difference in the routing behaviour. So no > matter if the carpool flag was set or not and no matter if the carpool > avoidance was set or not, routing was always the same. So I doubt if > the > bit which we call carpool bit really influences carpool handling.
Neither can I see any difference if a road has mkgmap:carpool=yes or not. So what is the benefit of this mkgmap:carpool tag? _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
