Hi Wanmil,
I have done a few tests with your debug function.
It didnt report all roads in the log file, but the ones that were logged gave a
good insight of the routing bits that were on and off.
I added two rules to the end of the default branch line style to see what will
happen:
highway=cycleway {set mkgmap:carpool=no}
highway=primary {set mkgmap:carpool=yes}
Example primary:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/215516920
215516920 0x3 00000111000 [N237 Utrechtseweg, Utrechtseweg (N237), N237, null]
means bicycle=no, foot=no, carpool=yes, car=yes
cycleway:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/206642571
206642571 0x7 01101010111 [Utrechtseweg, null, null, null]
means bicycle=yes, foot=no, carpool=no, car=no
Test Basecamp:
1) vehicle=car, carpool avoidance on: routes on primary! avoids cycleways
2) vehicle=car, carpool off: routes on primary, routes on cycleways!
3) vehicle=bicycle, carpool on (=default): routes on primary, avoids cycleways
!
4) vehicle=bicycle, carpool off: routes on primary!, routes on cycleways
5) pedestrian mode: routes on primary, routes on cycleways
Another test: I've set carpool=yes on all unclassified roads
highway=unclassified {set mkgmap:carpool=yes}
highway=residential {set mkgmap:carpool=yes}
Example
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/6996189
6996189 0x6 00000001000 [Kerkstraat, null, null, null]
carpool=yes
6) carpool on/off doesn't block routing on this road
My conclusions
-The mkgmap:carpool bit seems to have no influence on routing (carpool
avoidance on/off) in Basecamp.
-no-car=1 or 0 seems only related if carpool avoidance is switched on/off
-no-bike is ignored, no-foot is ignored
-If carpool avoidance is switched off there are small routing differences in
vehicle type which are -I think- caused by the differences in road_classes
(situation 2 vs 4)
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
