Hi WanMil, WanMil wrote > Ahh, that's fine. > Unfortunately it shows the big problem of mps: thery are much too > complicated (but this is not relevant for mkgmap - we have to support it > until they are replaced by another OSM data structure). > > Does that also mean that we should another check for that?
yes, I did not yet look deeply into the code, but I guess we can use this rule to simplify the routine that joins ways? Question is: what should happen if a relation doesn't meet the criteria? Ignore it completely or ignore elements that are invalid? Gerd -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/type-multipolygon-relations-tp5793518p5793636.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
