Hi WanMil,
WanMil wrote
Ahh, that's fine.
Unfortunately it shows the big problem of mps: thery are much too
complicated (but this is not relevant for mkgmap - we have to support it
until they are replaced by another OSM data structure).
Does that also mean that we should another check for that?
yes, I did not yet look deeply into the code, but I guess we
can use this rule to simplify the routine that joins ways?
Question is: what should happen if a relation doesn't meet the
criteria? Ignore it completely or ignore elements that are invalid?
Gerd
Hi Gerd,
I don't think that the routine that joins ways will become easier. The
task is still the same (join n ways at point p) and the existing routine
does not have any error handling (like a backtracking algorithm when a
join does not lead to a closed polygon).
So an additional warning should be enough from my point of view.
WanMil
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
