On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 04:45:35AM -0700, GerdP wrote:
Hi Marko,
Marko Mäkelä wrote
I think that the new code is generating noise for a U-shaped oneway
"handles" on major twoway roads (a parking lane for making a break, only
accessible from one direction of travelling). Here is an example:
when the message contains the word check it is for me.
It means that I plan to verify that mkgmap does the right thing.
I'll remove them later.
OK. But, like I said, a warning for this would be nice. The only_* looks
better in JOSM and I suppose is easier to understand too, than the no_*.
Here is one more strange message (no_u_turn with a via way). I see
nothing wrong with the way:
2014/03/29 19:56:21 WARNING (RestrictionRelation): 63240005.osm.pbf:
can't add restriction relation 532033 type no_u_turn
Maybe the two oneway lanes of the road were merged to other ways, so
that in the mkgmap routing graph, the two oneways and the via way form a
loop of three ways? But still, the no_u_turn should make sense.
Relations with access tags can sometimes be hard to understand, such as
relation 2996233, which is type=no_u_turn, motor_vehicle=destination.
I think that it would be better to avoid turn restrictions and tag the
ways instead. That could be done in this case too. I will ask the
mapper, because the role=to way looks like a stub.
Marko
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
