Hallo Gerd,
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 03:54:14PM +0200, Gerd Petermann wrote:
just to make sure:
The example shows a no_u_turn restriction
where "from" way and "to" way are equal and a via node is used.
Are that the criteria which should tell mkgmap to emit an info and
ignore the restriction?
Why not a warning? I'd say all correct restriction relations which are
ignored should produce a warning.
Yes, this is a restriction=no_u_turn, with the same way in role=to and
role=from, and one of the way endpoints being the role=via node.
You are right, it could be a warning as well. The warning message should
mention the restriction type and that the from,to ways are equal.
The warning could then be filtered out with a grep -vf script (as long
as it is for restriction=no_u_turn), or the map data could be reviewed
and edited, possibly after consulting the mapper, the wiki, or the
applicable 'authorities'.
Marko
PS: Yesterday and today I addressed most warnings from via-ways -r3143
for Finland. Tomorrow it should complain very little. I left this
no_u_turn relation unchanged.
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
