Hi Henning, okay, for the beginning I'll only add a warning containing the url of the node. I'll do that when the refactoring is done.
Gerd Henning Scholland wrote > Hi Gerd, > in most cases you will be correct with your assumption. But I cannot say > for sure, that there isn't a case outside in reality, for which the > tagging on crossing node is correct. So I'm not sure if ignoring would > be helpful in every case. > > Maybe it would be a better thing to generate for such osm-bugs > gpx-files, which contains the bugs. So it would be easy to fix them. > > Henning > > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/barriers-on-major-roads-tp5803700p5803703.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
