On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 10:51:07PM +0200, Felix Hartmann wrote: > On Mon, 10 Oct 2022 at 22:05, ael <witwa...@disroot.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 09:39:11PM +0200, Felix Herwegh wrote: > > > > > > I have mapped gates in a fence/wall which are not on routable lines. > > These are very important if you are to find your way out of an enclosure > > or field. I am thinking of just such a place on a rugged hillside where > > the location of the gate can not be seen until quite close. > > > > Are you sure this is correct tagging? I think this would merit a > highway=path - maybe with low visibility (key visibility)
Yes. There was no path: just an open field - well an enclosed area of hillside with walls and fencing to retain livestock. I entered it expecting to be able to cross and exit somewhere on the far boundary, but found myself trapped inside. It took a little while to find my way back to the gate. So no sensible path at all. Unless one invented a tiny path just crossing the boundary. It seems entirely legitimate: very similar to "entrance" on a building. After that I also recorded the location of gates through walls and fences in the area, although I think in most of those cases there were footways that I also mapped. But not always. ael _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
