HI Bernard,

 

I can’t see why bicycle routes should be displaying in the wrong order, but if 
an MTB route runs along a bicycle route and its relation is processed after the 
bicycle one, I think the route value will be changed from bicycle to mtb. I 
suggest using add instead of set on the relation statement for mountain bike 
routes:

 

type=route & route=mtb
    {
        apply
            {add route='${route}'; set 
route_mtb_name='$(route_mtb_name),${name}'|'${name}'; set 
route_mtb_ref='$(route_mtb_ref),${ref}'|'${ref}';}
    }



Regards,

Mike

 

From: Bernard Mai <bm....@gmx.de> 
Sent: 26 January 2024 10:50
To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
Subject: [mkgmap-dev] Ranking of relations

 

Dear all,
I want to generate an overlay map to be used as additional layer on a Garmin 
watch. This layer can be turned on/off on the watch and should show only 
bicycle routes (route=bicycle and route=mtb).
As most routes in openstreetmap are defined as relations I am using the 
following rules in my bike-routes style:

relations (file)
# Route relations as additional transparent layer for:
#   bicycle
#   mtb

# bicycle routes 
type=route & route=bicycle
    {
        apply
            {set route='${route}';set 
route_name='$(route_name),${name}'|'${name}';set 
route_ref='$(route_ref),${ref}'|'${ref}';}
    }
type=route & route=bicycle & network=icn            {apply {set route_icn=yes;}}
type=route & route=bicycle & network=ncn            {apply {set route_ncn=yes;}}
type=route & route=bicycle & network=rcn            {apply {set route_rcn=yes;}}
type=route & route=bicycle & network=lcn            {apply {set route_lcn=yes;}}

# mountainbike routes 
type=route & route=mtb
    {
        apply
            {set route='${route}'; set 
route_mtb_name='$(route_mtb_name),${name}'|'${name}'; set 
route_mtb_ref='$(route_mtb_ref),${ref}'|'${ref}';}
    }

lines (file)
# bicycle routes
route=bicycle & route_icn=yes    {name '${route_ref}'}                          
                          [0x10f01 resolution 18-22 continue]
route=bicycle & route_icn=yes    {name '${route_name} 
(${route_ref})'|'${route_name}'|'${route_ref}'}    [0x10f02 resolution 23-24]

route=bicycle & route_ncn=yes                                                   
                         [0x10f01 resolution 20-22 continue]
route=bicycle & route_ncn=yes    {name '${route_ref}'}                          
                          [0x10f02 resolution 23 continue]
route=bicycle & route_ncn=yes    {name '${route_name} 
(${route_ref})'|'${route_name}'|'${route_ref}'}    [0x10f02 resolution 24]

route=bicycle & route_rcn=yes                                                   
                         [0x10f03 resolution 20-22 continue]
route=bicycle & route_rcn=yes    {name '${route_ref}'}                          
                          [0x10f04 resolution 23 continue]
route=bicycle & route_rcn=yes    {name '${route_name} 
(${route_ref})'|'${route_name}'|'${route_ref}'}    [0x10f04 resolution 24]

route=bicycle & route_lcn=yes    {name '${route_name} 
(${route_ref})'|'${route_name}'|'${route_ref}'}    [0x10f05 resolution 24]

# mtb routes
route=mtb     {name '${route_mtb_ref}'}                                         
                           [0x10f06 resolution 23 continue]
route=mtb     {name '${route_mtb_name} 
(${route_mtb_ref})'|'${route_mtb_name}'|'${route_mtb_ref}'}        [0x10f06 
resolution 24]


In general, these routes are drawn by mkgmap and I am able to generate an 
overlay map, but sometimes a route with "lower" priority (i. e. a route=mtb) 
hides a route with "higher" priority. In other words, I would like to show the 
routes in a ranking: The routes tagged with network=icn should be on top, 
followed by network=ncn and so on. The route=mtb should be only shown, if no 
other bicycle route is on the same way.
Is this possible to achieve with mkgmap alone? Or do I need some sort of 
additional script to rank the relations before rendering them with mkgmap?
I have read something, that the draw order depends on the ID of the relation 
and mkgmap renders the lower IDs first. But what about the higher relation IDs? 
It looks like ways tagged from the relation only get the tags from the relation 
with the lowest ID. Is this correct?
Does anybody have an idea, how this could be overcome?

Example:
Way ID has 3 bicycle relevant relations: relation IDs 2119154, 9623717,2956920. 
With the style from above only the last one (relation ID 2956920, route=mtb) is 
shown although the second one (relation ID 9623717, network=icn) would be 
desired as it is an international bicycle route.

Regards,
Bernard

_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

Reply via email to