Dear Mike,
I looks like your suggestion did the trick. With the following lines in
the "relations" file I get the desired display of routes in my overlay map:
# bicycle routes
route=bicycle
{
apply
{set route='${route}';set
route_name='$(route_name),${name}'|'${name}';set
route_ref='$(route_ref),${ref}'|'${ref}';}
}
type=route & route=bicycle & network=icn {apply {add
route_icn=yes;}}
type=route & route=bicycle & network=ncn {apply {add
route_ncn=yes;}}
type=route & route=bicycle & network=rcn {apply {add
route_rcn=yes;}}
type=route & route=bicycle & network=lcn {apply {set
route_lcn=yes;}}
# mountainbike routes
route=mtb
{
apply
{add route_mtb=yes; add
route_mtb_name='$(route_mtb_name),${name}'|'${name}'; add
route_mtb_ref='$(route_mtb_ref),${ref}'|'${ref}';}
}
In the "lines" file I can adjust the zoom-level display and naming. For
me the following lines work well:
# bicycle routes
route_icn=yes [0x10f01
resolution 18-20 continue]
route_icn=yes {name '${route_ref}'}
[0x10f01 resolution 20-23 continue]
route_icn=yes {name '${route_name}
(${route_ref})'|'${route_name}'|'${route_ref}'} [0x10f02 resolution 24]
route_ncn=yes [0x10f01
resolution 20-22 continue]
route_ncn=yes {name '${route_ref}'}
[0x10f01 resolution 23 continue]
route_ncn=yes {name '${route_name}
(${route_ref})'|'${route_name}'|'${route_ref}'} [0x10f02 resolution 24]
route_rcn=yes [0x10f03
resolution 21-22 continue]
route_rcn=yes {name '${route_ref}'}
[0x10f03 resolution 23 continue]
route_rcn=yes {name '${route_name}
(${route_ref})'|'${route_name}'|'${route_ref}'} [0x10f04 resolution 24]
route_lcn=yes [0x10f05
resolution 23 continue]
route_lcn=yes {name '${route_name}'|'${route_ref}'}
[0x10f05 resolution 24]
# mtb routes
route_mtb=yes {name '${route_mtb_ref}'}
[0x10f06 resolution 23 continue]
route_mtb=yes {name '${route_mtb_name}
(${route_mtb_ref})'|'${route_mtb_name}'|'${route_mtb_ref}'} [0x10f06
resolution 24]
Now I can play around, as the display of these lines as overlay map on a
Garmin Epix watch is quite thin (even with lines up to 18 pixel width,
having 6-7 pixel width used with a colour and the remaining pixels
transparent to show the route beside any way). In general, my experience
is that specially on a watch all bitmap lines are hard to see.
Many thanks and regards,
Bernard
Am 27.01.2024 um 16:11 schrieb m...@tvage.co.uk:
HI Bernard,
I can’t see why bicycle routes should be displaying in the wrong
order, but if an MTB route runs along a bicycle route and its relation
is processed after the bicycle one, I think the route value will be
changed from bicycle to mtb. I suggest using add instead of set on the
relation statement for mountain bike routes:
type=route & route=mtb
{
apply
{add route='${route}'; set
route_mtb_name='$(route_mtb_name),${name}'|'${name}'; set
route_mtb_ref='$(route_mtb_ref),${ref}'|'${ref}';}
}
Regards,
Mike
*From:*Bernard Mai <bm....@gmx.de>
*Sent:* 26 January 2024 10:50
*To:* mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
*Subject:* [mkgmap-dev] Ranking of relations
Dear all,
I want to generate an overlay map to be used as additional layer on a
Garmin watch. This layer can be turned on/off on the watch and should
show only bicycle routes (route=bicycle and route=mtb).
As most routes in openstreetmap are defined as relations I am using
the following rules in my bike-routes style:
*relations (file)*
# Route relations as additional transparent layer for:
# bicycle
# mtb
# bicycle routes
type=route & route=bicycle
{
apply
{set route='${route}';set
route_name='$(route_name),${name}'|'${name}';set
route_ref='$(route_ref),${ref}'|'${ref}';}
}
type=route & route=bicycle & network=icn {apply {set route_icn=yes;}}
type=route & route=bicycle & network=ncn {apply {set route_ncn=yes;}}
type=route & route=bicycle & network=rcn {apply {set route_rcn=yes;}}
type=route & route=bicycle & network=lcn {apply {set route_lcn=yes;}}
# mountainbike routes
type=route & route=mtb
{
apply
{set route='${route}'; set
route_mtb_name='$(route_mtb_name),${name}'|'${name}'; set
route_mtb_ref='$(route_mtb_ref),${ref}'|'${ref}';}
}
*lines (file)*
# bicycle routes
route=bicycle & route_icn=yes {name '${route_ref}'}
[0x10f01 resolution 18-22 continue]
route=bicycle & route_icn=yes {name '${route_name}
(${route_ref})'|'${route_name}'|'${route_ref}'} [0x10f02 resolution
23-24]
route=bicycle & route_ncn=yes
[0x10f01 resolution 20-22 continue]
route=bicycle & route_ncn=yes {name '${route_ref}'}
[0x10f02 resolution 23 continue]
route=bicycle & route_ncn=yes {name '${route_name}
(${route_ref})'|'${route_name}'|'${route_ref}'} [0x10f02 resolution 24]
route=bicycle & route_rcn=yes
[0x10f03 resolution 20-22 continue]
route=bicycle & route_rcn=yes {name '${route_ref}'}
[0x10f04 resolution 23 continue]
route=bicycle & route_rcn=yes {name '${route_name}
(${route_ref})'|'${route_name}'|'${route_ref}'} [0x10f04 resolution 24]
route=bicycle & route_lcn=yes {name '${route_name}
(${route_ref})'|'${route_name}'|'${route_ref}'} [0x10f05 resolution 24]
# mtb routes
route=mtb {name '${route_mtb_ref}'}
[0x10f06 resolution 23 continue]
route=mtb {name '${route_mtb_name}
(${route_mtb_ref})'|'${route_mtb_name}'|'${route_mtb_ref}'}
[0x10f06 resolution 24]
In general, these routes are drawn by mkgmap and I am able to generate
an overlay map, but sometimes a route with "lower" priority (i. e. a
route=mtb) hides a route with "higher" priority. In other words, I
would like to show the routes in a ranking: The routes tagged with
network=icn should be on top, followed by network=ncn and so on. The
route=mtb should be only shown, if no other bicycle route is on the
same way.
Is this possible to achieve with mkgmap alone? Or do I need some sort
of additional script to rank the relations before rendering them with
mkgmap?
I have read something, that the draw order depends on the ID of the
relation and mkgmap renders the lower IDs first. But what about the
higher relation IDs? It looks like ways tagged from the relation only
get the tags from the relation with the lowest ID. Is this correct?
Does anybody have an idea, how this could be overcome?
Example:
Way ID has 3 bicycle relevant relations: relation IDs 2119154,
9623717,2956920. With the style from above only the last one (relation
ID 2956920, route=mtb) is shown although the second one (relation ID
9623717, network=icn) would be desired as it is an international
bicycle route.
Regards,
Bernard
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
