On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:27:05PM +0530, Ankit Aggarwal wrote: > I don't think just doing "omp_set_num_threads" will leads to optimal > execution. I don't think openMP is NUMA aware (I never dig that much deeper > in openMP). I think it maybe better to use simple std::thread along with > hwloc for NUMA awareness or pthread(they provide more control support).
Given that parallelism in mlpack is OpenMP in order to keep the codebase as simple and maintainable as possible, I think that what you have listed is not a concern. -- Ryan Curtin | "Hey, tell me the truth... are we still in the [email protected] | game?" - The Chinese Waiter _______________________________________________ mlpack mailing list [email protected] http://knife.lugatgt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlpack
