Given that parallelism in mlpack is OpenMP in order to keep the codebase as simple and maintainable as possible, I think that what you have listed is not a concern.
Sure. On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:30 PM, Ryan Curtin <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:27:05PM +0530, Ankit Aggarwal wrote: > > I don't think just doing "omp_set_num_threads" will leads to optimal > > execution. I don't think openMP is NUMA aware (I never dig that much > deeper > > in openMP). I think it maybe better to use simple std::thread along with > > hwloc for NUMA awareness or pthread(they provide more control support). > > Given that parallelism in mlpack is OpenMP in order to keep the codebase > as simple and maintainable as possible, I think that what you have > listed is not a concern. > > -- > Ryan Curtin | "Hey, tell me the truth... are we still in the > [email protected] | game?" - The Chinese Waiter >
_______________________________________________ mlpack mailing list [email protected] http://knife.lugatgt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlpack
