Agreed. 

Though its not so easy to setup a VPN, as well as rules to route DNS traffic to 
it. At least for the average user.

K

On 23 May 2012, at 10:49, Raphael Borg Ellul Vincenti wrote:

> Best thing I can suggest is running the DNS traffic over a VPN and hosting a 
> local DNS caching server on your network
> 
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Anton Xuereb <[email protected]> wrote:
> that still wouldn't work as they simple capture all traffic on port 53 and 
> redirect transparently to their own servers
> 
> 
> On 23 May 2012 10:37, Keith Vassallo <[email protected]> wrote:
> I personally stopped using GO a long time ago, and can proudly say that my 
> house has NONE of GO's services... not even a fixed line.
> 
> Melita does not have this problem. Yet. Remember that by blocking trackers 
> and bittorrent, they're not just bowing the IP holders, but more importantly 
> for them they're hugely reducing the amount of bandwidth they need. 
> 
> I can't test this at home, because I'm on Melita, however...
> 
> Does GO have domains to point to its DNS servers, or just as IP? In the 
> latter case you could modify your local hosts file to make the domain resolve 
> to Google's DNS servers, or OpenDNS or something similar. 
> 
> K
> 
> 
> On 23 May 2012, at 09:57, Anton Xuereb wrote:
> 
>> glad to have helped. P.S. Their 25mbit fibre with 1.5mbit upload is 
>> deeeeeeeeliciousss
>> 
>> On 23 May 2012 09:55, Ramon Casha <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I suspect that the nefarious role was the intended effect. Thanks for 
>> telling me about Melita. I'll probably switch everything over pretty soon.
>> 
>> 
>> Ramon Casha
>> 
>> 
>> On 23 May 2012 09:14, Anton Xuereb <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I'v been aware of this setup for quite some time now. Afaik the initial 
>> reason for this setup was that since they bought so many competitors, they 
>> resolved to this tactic instead of having to contact all their customers to 
>> change DNS settings. Ofcourse, this setup seems to now have taken a more 
>> nefarious role. 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 23 May 2012 09:10, Paul Morley <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Yes that has happen to me a few times,
>> I think their spam filtering zaps the message but unfortunately it does not 
>> tell the sender the email has been block and and not sent also it doesn't 
>> tell the receiver that the message was blocked, so he will never know a 
>> message was sent in the first place...!!    
>> 
>> On 05/23/2012 06:27 AM, Daniel wrote:
>>> 
>>> From my experience with Melita....I send some particular emails with 
>>> attachments and they finish somewhere in cyperspace....there  is NO 
>>> acknowledgement that the email has been withheld (for any medieval reason 
>>> maybe!!) for the sender and neither to the receiver!!!
>>> 
>>> On 23/05/12 06:03, Ramon Casha wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20120521/letters/Internet-privacy.420660
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Ramon Casha
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> MLUG-list mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> MLUG-list mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>> 
>> -- 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> MLUG-list mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> MLUG-list mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> MLUG-list mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> MLUG-list mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MLUG-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MLUG-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MLUG-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
MLUG-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list

Reply via email to